Legal Opinion
City of Gallup v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Company of New Mexico, Intervenor. (Four Cases)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 11, 1983No. 82-1069, 82-1075, 82-1099 and 82-1115PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
These motions ask the court to function once again as finish-line umpires in a “race to the courthouse.” The City of Gallup, New Mexico, seeks review in this court of an order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission setting rates for the Public Service Company of New Mexico. Meanwhile the company has filed petitions for review in the Tenth Circuit. The motions before us concern the question of which court first received a proper petition for review. The parties have given their best effort to the race, employing walkie-talkies, long-distance phone lines, split-second…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. v. Rederiaktiebolaget TransatlanticSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. Dr. Eula Bingham, Assistant Secretary of Labor, the American Petroleum Institute, the National Petroleum Refiners Association on Behalf of Their Respective Members and American Petrofina, Incorporated v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor, Dr. Eula Bingham, Assistant Secretary of Labor, and Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, Manufacturing Chemists Association, American Iron and Steel Institute, Independent Petroleum Association of America, Industrial Union Dept., Afl-Cio and United Rubber Workers, Afl-Cio, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Itt World Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- American Public Gas Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- Checkosky v. SecCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Checkosky v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Southern Pacific Pipe Lines, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Transportation, State of Texas, State of California, Intervenors. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Mesa Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Superior Industries International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.