Nash v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Even if it be conceded that the proposed refunding-bonds would be subject to the discretionary power of the General Assembly hereafter to exempt certain residential property from taxation, because issued after the adoption of the 1936 constitutional amendment on the subject, which is not so conceded in view of the provisions of the Local Government Act and the ordinance authorizing the issuance of said bonds, still it is not perceived wherein this would in any wise affect the validity of said bonds; only their marketability, perhaps.
It is recognized that the bonds now outstanding, which…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Folks v. County of MarionSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Sherrill v. MilamSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Newman v. . Comrs. of VanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Hill v. . KesslerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morris v. . HolshouserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Morris v. HolshouserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Bank v. . Bryson CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Boyce v. City of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Bryson City Bank v. Town of BrysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.