Legal Opinion

Bank v. . Bryson City

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to restrain issuance and delivery of refunding bonds pursuant to ordinance of defendant city.

The pertinent facts, duly found and set out in the judgment, follow:

1. The town of Bryson City has outstanding bonded indebtedness in the principal sum of $365,000, represented by bonds issued and held by purchasers prior to 1 July, 1933, the accrued interest thereon and a portion of the principal now being in default.

2. The town proposes to refinance its existing bonded indebtedness by issuing refunding bonds "in lieu of, and to be exchanged for a like amount of its said outstanding…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Brine v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Louisiana v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Wilson v. . MooresvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Motsinger v. PerrymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Motsinger v. . PerrymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Wilson v. Town of MooresvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API