Legal Opinion
Holloman v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 13, 2006No. 53, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.
This case presents us with the task of delineating the scope and application of our decision in Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc., 378 Md. 139, 835 A.2d 656 (2003), to an arbitration agreement between Circuit City Stores, Inc. (“Circuit City”) and one of its former employees, La’Tia *583Holloman (“Holloman”), which governed all disputes that arose during their employment relationship, in which Circuit City reserved the right to alter or rescind the arbitration agreement on a single day of the year after thirty-days notice of the impending change. Holloman also asks this Court…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Mehdi Noohi v. Toll Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Dashiell v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Dickerson v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Koons Ford of Baltimore, Inc. v. LobachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Cain v. Midland Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.