Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1932No. 23301. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for wrongful death. The plaintiff is the administratrix of the estate of William E. Peterson, deceased, and brings this action on behalf of herself as his widow. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, Great Northern Railway Company and John Imberg, in the sum of $35,000. The defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the ■verdict, and, in the alternative, for a new trial. The motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was sustained. The motion for new trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. St. Germain v. Potlatch Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lee v. H. E. Gleason Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Norton v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McFarland v. Commercial Boiler Works, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Karp v. HerderWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Green v. LangnesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Allen v. Washington National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Shea v. Yellow Cab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API