Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Rogers

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1949No. S. F. 17770PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Petitioner has appealed from a judgment entered on the pleadings precluding him from participating as an heir in the distribution of his paternal aunt’s estate, as well as from an order denying his motion to amend his petition after judgment. The order is not appealable under the provisions of section 1240 of the Probate Code, and the appeal therefrom must be dismissed. The petition on which judgment was entered against petitioner on the pleadings alleged that although born the illegitimate son of decedent’s brother, he had been legitimated by his father under the provisions of section 230 of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Estate of LundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Rivieccio v. BothanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Wolf v. GallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of WoodwardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Darwin v. GangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. In Re Estate of CaldwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. Rossi v. ZappaterraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Beatrice A. Nielsen Tyler v. Louis Armstrong, as Administrator of the Estate of Felix FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API