Wolf v. Gall
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a portion of a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George A, Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Arturo Wolf and Maria Julia Wolf, the respondents in this case, are the children born out of wedlock of Newman Wolf and Carmen Gonzales, and seek to have awarded to them a share in the property described in the complaint as heirs at law of Tobe Funkenstein, deceased, their grandmother, by right of representation of their deceased father, it being the claim of respondents that the subsequent marriage of their parents legitimated them by virtue of the provisions of section 215 of the Civil Code, and that their adoption by their father into his family in connection with such marriage also had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In Re the Estate of GregorsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- In re Estate of WardellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Lamar v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Estate of LundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re Wray's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Esposito v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Turner v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Rossi v. ZappaterraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.