Navajo Refining Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Navajo Refining Company, L.P. (Navajo) and Montana Refining Company (Montana) (collectively, plaintiffs), seek damages from defendant, the Defense Energy Support Center (DESC),1 arising out of the use of an allegedly illegal economic price adjustment clause in a series of thirty-three competitively-awarded fuel supply contracts. The parties have filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is DENIED, and plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. Background
Navajo is a Delaware…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tesoro Hawaii Corporation, Tesoro Alaska Company and Hermes Consolidated, Inc., D/B/A Wyoming Refining Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Adair v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Sweet v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Tesoro Hawaii Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005