Legal Opinion
People v. Wise
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 2002PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Charles J. Tejada, J.
On September 5, 2002, Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, and Raymond Santana, the defendants, filed and served a no*482tice of motion, pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (g), motion to vacate judgment, for an order vacating their convictions after a jury trial of charges contained in Indictment Number 4762/89, upon the sole grounds of newly discovered evidence. Defendants Richardson, McCray and Santana were represented by Michael W. Warren, Esq., and Roger Wareham, Esq. Defendant Salaam was represented by Myron Beldock, Esq., and defendant Wise was represented by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- People v. SalemiNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- People v. SalaamNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fine v. ESPN, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- State v. CopeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- People v. Sterling, New York County Courts2004
- COMMONWEALTH v. STANLEY S., a juvenile.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2021
- Armond McCloud, Jr. v. The City of New York, et al.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.