Legal Opinion

Hylton v. Watt

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 19, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2017-2023Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LANIER M. HYLTON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2023 (RDM) MARK A. CALABRIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Lanier Hylton, proceeding pro se, alleges that the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) discriminated against him based on his race, age, and disability in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”),

29 U.S.C. § 621

et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,

29 U.S.C. § 701

et seq., when it failed to hire…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API