Malcom v. Webb
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
1. A ruling on a general demurrer is reviewable at the option of the losing party by either a direct exception or by exception pendente lite. But by filing pendente lite exceptions the ruling is made a pendente lite judgment and can be reviewed only in a bill of exceptions complaining of the final judgment. Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 (1) (79 S. E. 841); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 (188 S. E. 699); Rabhan v. Rabhan, 185 Ga. 355 (195 S. E. 193); Story v. City of Macon, 203 Ga. 105 (2) (45 S. E. 2d, 196).
2. Where, as here, the judgment on the general demurrer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Durrence v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Rabhan v. RabhanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Gilbert v. Tippens, superintendent of banksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Story v. City of MacOnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hutchins v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954