Legal Opinion
State v. Gray
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 24, 2006No. 55228-7-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
¶1 Under RCW 26.50.110(5), a conviction for violating a no-contact order (NCO) issued under certain statutes is a felony if the offender has at least two prior convictions for violating NCOs issued under those same statutes. A jury convicted Robert Gray of domestic violence violation of an NCO and returned a special verdict finding that he had two prior convictions for violating NCOs. Gray appeals, arguing that the statutory authority for the previously-violated NCOs is an essential element of felony violation of an NCO that must be found by the jury. In State v. Carmen, we ruled that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. CochraneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. CochraneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. OrtegaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. BossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.