Carol A. MacY v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
We are to decide if written communications between the Post Office Department and appellant constituted a release precluding appellant from bringing a claim for personal injuries under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. The district court found a binding release to exist under 28 U.S.C. § 2672 and granted summary judgment for the government. We vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Section 2672 provides in pertinent part: The acceptance by the claimant of any such award, compromise, or settlement shall be final…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Three Rivers Motors Company v. The Ford Motor Company and Auto Lite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Evans v. MarksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Grota v. LaBoccettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Lehigh Val. Transp. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Sears, Sucsy & Co. v. Insurance Company of No. Amer.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sharon A. Reo v. United States Postal Service United States of America Patricia D'esposito. United States of America, Defendant/third-Party v. Joseph J. Reo, Jr. Marjorie Reo Third-Party v. State Farm Insurance Company, Fourth-Party Sharon ReoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Mikropul Corp. v. Desimone & Chaplin-Airtech, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- In Re Conston Corp., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- In Re CudeyroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Starr v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.