Legal Opinion
Starr v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided September 8, 1988No. Civ. A. 8553PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTNETT, Vice Chancellor.
In this suit plaintiffs seek to have reformed the uninsured motorist coverage provisions contained in two insurance policies issued by defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) and one policy issued by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). One of the Nationwide policies provided liability and uninsured motorist coverage to the plaintiffs and the other provided similar coverage to Vanessa Street, who was the driver of an automobile in which plaintiff Lamont Starr, a passenger, was injured. The State Farm policy provides…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Shingleton v. BusseySupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Adams v. JankouskasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Fidelity and Cas. Co. of New York v. CopeSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- City of Memphis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National American Insurance Co. of Nebraska, Inc. v. Continental Western InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. StarrSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Lomax v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- Brown v. GEICO Choice Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
- Manolakakis v. Insurance Corp. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.