Pearsall v. . Bloodworth
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogdeN, J.
Is the change of beneficiary from his estate to his wife, made by an insolvent husband, in an ordinary policy of life insurance providing for a change of beneficiary at the option of the insured, valid and effectual against creditors of such insolvent?
The question of the validity of the assignment of a policy of life insurance when the insured is insolvent was considered by this Court in Burton v. Farinholt, 86 N. C., 260. The Court held that a life insurance policy was a chose in action and became an integral part of the estate of the insolvent immediately upon the delivery of the policy,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bailey v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Burton v. . FarinholtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- In re Simmons & GriffinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
- Eldredge v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Russell v. . OwenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Rountree v. FrazeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. HitchcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Teague v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Meadows Fertilizer Co. v. GodleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.