Legal Opinion

Meadows Fertilizer Co. v. Godley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 22, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

There can be, from the facts found by the court below, no controversy as to insurance policy No. 302762, on the life of Marshall W. Godley, it being properly changed as to the beneficiary under the terms of the policy. In fact, in the appellee’s brief we find: “Having in mind these principles we are forced to the conclusion by the facts in the case that as to policy No. 302762 he had a definite purpose to change the beneficiary and did what he could, and all he could, to effect such change.”

The appeal presents the question only whether the policy No. 302773 was properly changed in accordance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wooten v. Grand United Order of Odd FellowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Pollock v. . Household of RuthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Lanier v. Insurance Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Lockhart v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Herring v. SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Wilson v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. English v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Insurance Co. v. . MurdockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Travellers Insurance Co. v. MurdockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API