Maltbie v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
The defendant appeals her conviction of cruelty to children. The factual situation developed by the evidence at the defendant’s lengthy trial does not control the resolution of this case on appeal. Suffice it to say that, under the evidence, the jury was authorized to acquit or convict.
1. The trial judge concluded his charge to the jury at lunchtime. Prior to the jury’s being taken to lunch, they were instructed not to discuss the case among themselves or permit anyone to discuss the case with them. The jury commenced deliberations upon its return from the noon meal and did so…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Shaw v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Styles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Battle v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kimmel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Loftin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Dent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.