Wolpa v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
The question presented here arises on motion of the government to strike the bill of exceptions on the ground that “said Bill of Exceptions was not procured to be settled, nor settled, nor filed as provided by Rule 9 (28 U.S.C.A. following section 723a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court relating to appeals in Criminal causes, effective September 1, 1934.”
The files disclose that on November 14, 1935; appellant was convicted of a criminal offense and sentence was imposed upon *830him. On the same day he filed notice of appeal. On November 20, 1935, he applied to the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yep v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Fewox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Yep v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cusamano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Vermillion v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Spero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.