Legal Opinion

United States v. Ray

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 21, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was convicted of violations of the mail fraud statute and conspiracy (35 Stat. 1130, 35 Stat. 1096, 18 U.S. C.A. §§ 338, 88), and appeals from the judgment entered. The trial lasted 8 weeks; the testimony comprised about 4,000 pages and there were 500 exhibits received in evidence. The bill of exceptions was not settled and filed within the 30 days allowed by rule 9 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure in Criminal Cases (28 U.S.C.A. following section 723a). An extension was granted by the trial judge up to and including the 1st of November, 1936, which was a Sunday.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Paying Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Fraina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. United States v. AdamowiczCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  5. Wolpa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  3. Hightower v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. State v. Lyon, 2007 Ap 08 0050 (5-29-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API