Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Seabrook

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1977No. 186PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POMEROY, Justice.

In this appeal from a conviction for voluntary manslaughter 1 the principal issue 2 is whether the appellant was deprived of a fair trial on the merits because of the conduct of the judge presiding at the suppression hearing. We find appellant’s argument to be without merit, and affirm.

I

At the suppression hearing, Detective Herbert Winston testified that he read the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) to appellant from a standard “Miranda card” and entered her answers on a standard interview sheet.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Commonwealth v. PatskinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Commonwealth v. WattsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. O'BryantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. TroopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Shah v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. BrittonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API