Legal Opinion

Lakson v. Lakson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, C. J.

This is a suit in which both plaintiff and defendant are seeking to obtain a divorce. During the trial, after plaintiff had rested her case and while defendant was introducing testimony in his own behalf, the trial court, without giving plaintiff any opportunity to rebut the evidence offered by defendant, made the following announcement:

“I don’t think I care to hear any more evidence. I am ready to decide it right now. The defendant and cross-complainant will be awarded a decree of divorce, and further the court holds that he is the sole owner of the property asked for in the complaint; and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hawley v. HawleyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Weber v. WeberOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Salisbury v. GroddardOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Leefield v. LeefieldOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kreutzer v. KreutzerOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. BeasleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State ex rel. Connecticut v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. In re the Marriage of WiseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API