Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Wise

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2001No. C98 0769 DR; A107707Published

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Husband appeals from a judgment of dissolution. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3), we reverse and remand.

Both parties appeared for trial, prepared, at the appropriate specified date. Before calling any witnesses or presenting testimony, however, wife represented to the court that the case had been settled. Husband disputed that claim and offered to present evidence that not all of the issues between the parties had been resolved. Specifically, husband argued that the parties had not agreed who would claim tax exemptions for the parties’ two children or the precise amount of child support.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Lakson v. LaksonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. In re the Marriage of JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Hurst v. Mutual of EnumclawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API