Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Beasley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1992No. CC J-1650; CA A64963; SC S38281PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*446UNIS, J.

The broad question presented in this case is whether a trial court, in a proceeding to terminate parental rights under ORS 419.525,1 may quash a subpoena2 that requires the attendance of a minor child to testify as a witness on behalf of the parent whose parental rights to the child are sought to be terminated, and may refuse to allow that child, whose testimonial competence is not challenged, to give relevant testimony, on the ground that to allow the production and testimony of the child would be “contrary to the child’s best interest.”

This is an appeal from a termination of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. PinnellOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. McMasterOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Rea v. ReaOregon Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. HamptonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Dep't of Human Servs. v. T. M. D. (In re R. D. D.-G.)Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In Re Jam. J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API