Searcy v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of Humboldt County and Denver Sexier, Judge, from proceeding in a divorce action after change of venue. The facts are stated in the .opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
PREWETT, P. J., pro tem.
This is an application for a writ of prohibition to restrain respondents from proceeding further with certain orders and proposed orders in a divorce action wherein one Mary Louise Searcy is the plaintiff and above-named petitioner is defendant. Said superior court on the ninth day of January, 1920, on due proceedings had in that behalf, made and entered its final order changing the place of trial of said action from said county of Humboldt to the city and county of San Francisco. On the same day the petitioner appealed from said order and his appeal is now pending.
Notw…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bohnert v. BohnertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Chase v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Ex parte WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Fatt v. FattWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cody v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Badella v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Refrigeration Discount Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Badella v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955