Legal Opinion

Tarnavsky v. Rankin

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2009No. 20090085PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Edward Tarnavsky appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his action against Ron Rankin personally and in his capacity as sheriff of McKenzie County for claims involving separate sheriffs sales of Tarnavsky’s real and personal property. Tarnavsky generally challenges the propriety of the sheriffs sales and the district court’s discovery rulings. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Tarnavsky sued Rankin personally and in his capacity as sheriff of McKenzie County, alleging that Rankin committed “misfeasance” and “malfeasance” by ignoring Tarnavsky’s lawful exemptions in separate June…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Riemers v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Red River Wings, Inc. v. Hoot, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Earnest v. GarciaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Martin v. Trinity HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McColl Farms, LLC v. PflaumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Citizens State Bank-Midwest v. SymingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Spratt v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Finstad v. GordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hale v. Ward CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API