Legal Opinion
Hale v. Ward County
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 2012No. 20110171PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert and Susan Hale appeal a district court summary judgment dismissing their nuisance and governmental takings claims against Ward County and the City of Minot. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.1
I
[¶ 2] Robert and Susan Hale have a house on what is otherwise agricultural land approximately one mile southeast of a shooting range used for training Minot area local, state and federal law enforcement officers (“law enforcement shooting range”). A separate range operated by the Minot Rifle and Pistol Club is immediately north of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farmers Union Oil Co. of Garrison v. SmetanaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Earnest v. GarciaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Anderson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Doan Ex Rel. Doan v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. v. CreightonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Holverson v. LundbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Richard Herring of Herring Chiropractic Clinic v. Lisbon Partners Credit Fund, Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Flynn v. Hurley Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State of N.D. v. N.D. Insurance Reserve FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.