Legal Opinion
In Re Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 5, 2001No. Misc. 661PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., (“Pioneer”) petitions for a writ of mandamus to direct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to vacate its orders vitiating Pioneer’s attorney-client or work product privilege and requiring Pioneer’s in-house counsel to answer questions relating to certain subject matters and produce documents that are no longer protected by privilege. Monsanto Company (“Monsanto”) opposes. Pioneer replies.
BACKGROUND
Monsanto sued Pioneer for breach of contract, patent infringement, and misappropriation of trade…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Cedillo v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- In Re Seagate Technology, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Fidelity National Title Insurance Company of New York v. Intercounty National Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- In Re Echostar Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- In Re Christus Spohn Hospital KlebergTexas Supreme Court · 2007
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.