McDougall v. Bridges
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered July 10, 1908, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial before the court, refusing to cancel an assessment for the maintenance of a drainage district.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
In this action the appellant sought to restrain the collection of an assessment attempted to be levied upon her property by the drainage commissioners of Drainage District No. 1, of King county. The facts as found by the court are not questioned by either party, and are in substance these: Prior to September 30, 1902, certain freeholders residing in King county, owning land requiring drainage, organized a drainage district under the act of March 20, 1895 (Laws 1895, p. 271) and included therein, among other lands, a tract of land belonging to the appellant which contained 287 acres.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BurtonWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Smalley v. LaugenourWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Noble v. WhittenWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Woelflen v. Lewiston-Clarkston Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Eldridge v. StengerWashington Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Creditors Claim & Adjustment Co. v. First Seattle Dexter Horton National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Snohomish County v. AndrewsWashington Supreme Court · 1927