Legal Opinion

Creditors Claim & Adjustment Co. v. First Seattle Dexter Horton National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1933No. 24124. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is a garnishment controversy. Its correct disposition depends upon whether or not the following draft became, by its original issuance, a duly accepted negotiable draft or bill within the general rule that a draft or bill drawn upon the drawer, himself or itself, thereby becomes, in legal effect, an accepted draft or bill so that the indebtedness evidenced thereby becomes owing to its subsequent holder, for value, in good faith, and not an indebtedness owing to the original payee, and, as such, subject to garnishment at the suit of his creditor.

“583.23 December 26, 1930

Fidelity-Phenix…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Drinkall v. Movius State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. First National Bank v. Rhode Island InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Berenson v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co. of LiverpoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Pavenstedt v. . N.Y. Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. First National Bank v. Home InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frickleton v. FultonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Wachovia B. & T. Co. v. American Bank. Ins. Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API