Legal Opinion

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 8, 2007No. C 04-2000 CW, C 06-2929 CWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WILKEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff 02 Micro International Limited and Defendants Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPS), Michael Hsing, Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (ASMC), ASUSTeK Computer, Inc., and Compal Electronics, Inc. (collectively, Defendants) dispute the meaning of terms and phrases used in 02 Micro’s U.S. Patent No. 6,259,615 (the '615 patent), its U.S. Patent No. 6,396,722 (the '722 patent) and its U.S. Patent No. 6,804,-129 (the '129 patent). 1 02 Micro requests that the Court adopts the claim…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API