Legal Opinion
Karlo v. Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-1283PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the “Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Class Certification and Court Facilitated Notice” (“the motion”). (Docket No. 88). The motion is ripe for adjudication. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification (Docket No. 88) is GRANTED, in part, in accord with the following.
I. Introduction
This action is brought by named Plaintiffs Richard Csukas, Jeffrey Marietti, Mark K. McLure, Benjamin D. Thompson, Rudolph A. Karlo, David Meixelsberger and William S. Cunningham (“Plaintiffs”) and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rudolph Karlo v. Pittsburgh Glass Works LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Minuteman Spill Response, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Mott v. Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Fulghum v. Embarq Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- DENNIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.