Legal Opinion
Mott v. Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 21, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-5244PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Lori S. Mott, Cynthia Cotten, Susan Gibbs, Susan Moore, and Judy Rat-cliff, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, bring suit against Defendant Driveline Retail Merchandising Inc. (“Driveline”) alleging that Driveline failed to pay Plaintiffs for required work in violation of the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 206 & 207(a).1 Pursuant to the FLSA’s collective action provision at 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), Plaintiffs move for an order (1) granting conditional…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Victor Zavala v. Wal Mart Stores IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Symczyk v. Genesis HealthCare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Ruehl v. Viacom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Galt v. Eagleville HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- ARROYO v. ASPEN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Concurrent Ventures, LLC, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- NOLL v. FLOWERS FOODS INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020