Legal Opinion

Stornant v. Licari-Packard Grosse Pointe, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1952No. Docket 45, Calendar 45,076PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff was awarded workmen’s compensation by tbe commission and the defendants appeal. The only question involvéd is whether plaintiff’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. More precisely, the issue is whether the injury occurred in the course of his employment.

Plaintiff was employed by the defendant Packard automobile service garage as a bumper or metal finisher and furnished all his own tools except a grinder. His. tools included different sets of socket and end wrenches and air hammer, dolly blocks, and hammers of different descriptions. While not working he kept…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daniel v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Appleford v. KimmelMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Tegels v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Luteran v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rucker v. Michigan Smelting & Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacK v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bennett v. Vanderbilt UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. McKinney v. Hardwick Clothes, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Jean v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Blair v. Armour and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API