Legal Opinion
Poling v. Farrah
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 2001No. Civ.A. 99-3023 PLFPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack -of personal jurisdiction and improper venue. Plaintiff opposes the motion, arguing that the Court does have personal jurisdiction over the defendant. The Court agrees with plaintiff and therefore denies defendant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Donald Poling, a District of Columbia resident with his place of business in Maryland, seeks recovery from defendant Rhonda M. Farrah based on Ms. Farrah’s alleged violations of the federal and District of Columbia…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- United Liberty Life Insurance Company v. Timothy RyanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Maxus Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Hans Oetiker v. Jurid Werke, G. M. B. HCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thayer/Patricof Education Funding, L.L.C. v. Pryor Resources, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Wultz v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- In Re Bann Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Kazenercom Too v. Turan Petroleum, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Sisso v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.