Legal Opinion
Lozano v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 23, 2010No. 09-cv-6344PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMY J. ST. EVE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment LLC d/b/a Foxstore.com’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the Court denies Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
BACKGROUND
For purposes of deciding Defendants’ motion to dismiss, the Court accepts the following allegations as true. Defendants are film studios and/or retailers of movies on DVD. Defendants market their products, in part, by transmitting advertisements via…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- In re Jiffy Lube International, Inc., Text Spam LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Castro v. Green Tree Servicing LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Critchfield Physical Therapy v. Taranto Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Agne v. Papa John's International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.