State ex rel. Skordahl v. Flaherty
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of H. A. Skordahl and the county of Lac qui Parle the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the Honorable S. A. Elaherty, judge of the Sixteenth judicial district and the Honorable Eichard T. Daly, one of the judges of the Twelfth judicial district, to review the proceedings for the organization of the Minnesota Valley Drainage and Elood Control District under Laws 1917, c. 4A%, and ordered that the petitions for the two writs be…
Read the full summary
Upon the relation of H. A. Skordahl and the county of Lac qui Parle the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the Honorable S. A. Elaherty, judge of the Sixteenth judicial district and the Honorable Eichard T. Daly, one of the judges of the Twelfth judicial district, to review the proceedings for the organization of the Minnesota Valley Drainage and Elood Control District under Laws 1917, c. 4A%, and ordered that the petitions for the two writs be consolidated and the matter be heard upon one return. The respondents made return and prayed that the writs be dismissed or the…
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
These proceedings were instituted in the Twelfth and ” Sixteenth judicial districts to organize a drainage and flood control district, under chapter 442, p. 723, Laws of 1917, by filing petitions, in the form prescribed and containing the requisite number of qualified signers, in the office of the clerk of the district court in the counties of Big Stone, Swift and Lac qui Parle — the territory wherein the proposed district was to be established. Upon a hearing thereon before Judge Daly of the Twelfth district and Judge Flaherty of the Sixteenth, sitting together, an order was made…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Luley v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State ex rel. Patterson v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- State ex rel. Young v. BrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- State ex rel. Jonason v. CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- McGee v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vacation of Part of Town of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- People ex rel. Setters v. LeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Timpanogos Planning & Water Management Agency v. Central Utah Water Conservancy DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- In re HullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- In Re Proposed Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.