Legal Opinion

Highton v. Dessau

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 6, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Richard Highton and others against Simon Dessau. Prom a. judgment entered on the report of a referee in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed. Argued before Bookstaver, Bischoff, and Pryor, JJ.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The first question to be considered on this appeal is the one raised by respondent’s counsel, as to what was denied in the answer. Prom a careful examination of the pleadings, we are convinced he is wrong in supposing that the second paragraph of the answer, which contains a denial of the fifth and sixth allegations of the complaint, was intended to refer to distinct allegations in the various paragraphs of the complaint; but we think- the denial was intended to and did refer to the paragraphs themselves, as numbered and marked therein.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stewart Howell v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Doll v. . NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Smith v. . AlkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Bowery National Bank v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Leslie v. . Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. EarlyNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Scully v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1912
  3. New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. AndrewsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  4. Pollock v. Pennsylvania Iron Works Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API