Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Pennsylvania Iron Works Co.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 3, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from city court, general term. Action by Alexander Pollock against the Pennsylvania Iron Works Company. From a judgment of the city court (33 N. Y. Supp. 1133) affirming a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This action was brought to recover for extra work done by respondent for the appellant. The plaintiff contracted with the defendant to do certain work in the Broadway cable power house in this city, under written specifications. This work consisted of the furnishing and erecting of all pipes, valves, fittings, and materials necessary for the operations of the boilers, engines, heaters, and pumps in the power house. The alleged extra work consisted in furnishing certain tees, elbows, and crosses of special design, drawings for which were furnished by defendant’s engineer in charge of the work.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Duplex Safety Boiler Co. v. . GardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Russell v. . AllertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Doll v. . NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Bowery National Bank v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Butler v. TuckerNew York Supreme Court · 1840

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cranetex, Inc. v. Precision Crane & Rigging of Houston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Raw Silk Trading Co. v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API