New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Andrews
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from trial term. Action by the New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Company against James F. Andrews to recover the contract price of certain work, and also for extra work and services. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.
This action was brought against the defendant to recover upon two causes of action; the first being for the sum of $1,400, which the plaintiff claims the defendant agreed to pay for equipping his factory at Astoria, L. I. with its dry-pipe system of automatic sprinklers, under the terms of a contract between the parties dated September 19, 1889, and also for extra work, labor, and services on defendant's premises at Astoria to the amount of $123.69. The contract provided that the plaintiff should equip the factory in question in accordance with the rules and regulations of the New York Board…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crouch v. . GutmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Doll v. . NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Smith v. . AlkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Bowery National Bank v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Thomas v. StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. AndrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. AndrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. AndrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899