Legal Opinion
Patricia Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck, & Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 1, 1999No. 1998PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant Patricia Cosgrove (“Cosgrove” or “Plaintiff’), prose> appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen G. Schwartz, Judge) declining to consider Cosgrove’s objection to the bill of costs submitted by defendant-appellee Sears, Roebuck, and Company (“Sears” or “Defendant”). For the reasons set forth below, we vacate and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1981, Cosgrove filed an employment discrimination complaint against Sears, in the U.S. District Court for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Patricia Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Martha POE, Appellant, v. JOHN DEERE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Baez v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Stephen Tancredi and Ronald Speidel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Stock Company, and Metlife, Inc., a Delaware Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Ganino v. Citizens Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Ganino v. Citizens Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Swiatkowski v. CitibankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.