Samson v. Samson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant Richard Samson’s motion for modification of temporary spousal support. We reverse to the extent that the family court incorrectly allocated Richard’s1 severance pay to a single month for purposes of a provision in the parties’ stipulated support order requiring Richard to pay respondent Elaine Tong Samson 35 percent of his monthly compensation in excess of $25,000. This percentage-based component of the stipulated order, modeled after In re Marriage of Ostler & Smith (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 33 [272 Cal.Rptr. 560] (Ostler &…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Marriage of SkelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Riverwatch v. County of San Diego Department of Environmental HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Luri v. GreenwaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Freitas v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Marriage of Gallemore CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Pool-O'Connor v. GuadarramaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- SLPR, L.L.C. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020