Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe Children

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2001No. 23355PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Mother-appellant (Mother) and Father-appellant (Father) are appealing from the orders of the family court of the first circuit denying their respective motions for reconsideration and awarding permanent custody of their twin children—John Doe, born on December 22, 1997, and John Doe, bom on December 22, 1997—to the appellee Department of Human Resources (DHS). The DHS moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction, contending that Mother and Father failed to file timely notices of appeal.

For the reasons set forth below, we deny the DHS’s motions to dismiss.

I. BACKGROUND

This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Interest of DoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In the Interest of Doe ChildrenHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bank of Hawaii v. ShinnHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re BrandonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Cox v. Cox.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API