Schassen v. Columbia Gorge Motor Coach System
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
There is no claim here that the complaint does not state sufficient facts to constitute an action against defendant. There is no serious claim made that defendant was free from negligence. It is ably argued and seriously contended here that the complaint states facts showing plaintiff to have been guilty of contributory negligence. It is also earnestly urged that plaintiff’s testimony affirma tively shows that his injuries are the result of his own lack of care. It is admitted that plaintiff’s negligence would prevent his recovery if that negligence contributed to his injuries.
The complaint…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Hazel v. Hoopeston-Danville Motor Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Johns v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Walker v. PennerOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Cushing Refining & Gasoline Co. v. DeshanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Duncan v. MadridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Johnson v. UpdegraveOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Alt v. KrebsOregon Supreme Court · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.