United States v. Thomas Patrick Keelan
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
Thomas Patrick Keelan appeals the district court’s sentence ordering restitution pursuant to the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A. Keelan argues the district court erred in ordering restitution because (1) 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) is not a “crime of violence” as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 16(b); (2) the victim did not suffer a bodily injury; (3) a victim cannot recover mental health treatment expenses for a physical injury; and (4) Keelan’s criminal offense did not proximately cause the victim’s treatment expenses. Upon review, we affirm. 1
I. BACKGROUND
In the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Kevin FuertesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Carlton Baptiste v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Tori K. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.