Giambattista v. National Bank of Commerce
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Andersen, A.C.J.
— These consolidated cases arose out of the operations of certain New York money brokers in this state. At issue are questions involving the common-law doctrines of champerty and maintenance.
The trial court declined jurisdiction of the cases on the ground that the actions brought by the plaintiffs, as assignees of the money brokers, violated public policy against maintenance — and that the actions presented a potential for attorney conflict of interest regarding settlement. The trial court also denied, or did not rule on, the various parties' cross motions for summary judgment.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Matsumura v. EilertWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Busk v. HoardWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Fuqua v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Adams v. Union Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1899
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tjart v. Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Tjart v. Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Osprey, Inc. v. Cabana Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Whitaker v. Spiegel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- Osprey, Inc. v. Cabana Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.