Legal Opinion

Albert E. Obrist v. Charles H. Christensen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1964No. 19205_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

At issue here is the question of whether Christensen should have his general discharge in bankruptcy. The district court has affirmed the referee and has held that he should. Obrist, a creditor, appeals.

Prior to adjudication of bankruptcy, Christensen gave Obrist “bad checks,” not honored by the bank because of insufficient funds in the drawer’s account, in exchange for cattle. The checks were issued on different dates. Obrist contends to prevent a general discharge, as he must, that the checks were a false financial statement under 11 U.S.C. § 32 (Section 14 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. J. R. Williston & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920
  2. In re Rea Bros.District Court, D. Montana · 1917
  3. Peter Cottrell Scott v. Norma SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Heinold Commodities & Securities, Inc. v. Hunt (In Re Hunt)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
  2. Jack Master, Inc. v. Collins (In Re Collins)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1983
  3. D. Nagin Mfg. Co. v. Pollina (In Re Pollina)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
  4. Charlie Kelton's Pontiac, Cadillac, Oldsmobile & Isuzu Truck, Inc. v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  5. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. Paulk (In Re Paulk)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API