Legal Opinion

Burgos v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated November 17, 2000, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (2) an amended order of the same court, dated December 4, 2000, as granted the same relief.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated November 17, 2000, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the amended order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Stewart v. HaleviymAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Taylor v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Trainor v. Dayton Seaside Associates No. 3Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Prado v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Romeo v. Ronald McDonald HouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API