Legal Opinion
Romeo v. Ronald McDonald House
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 24, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*682In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated July 22, 2004, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Ronald McDonald House which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Norman’s Lakeville Exxon which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Simmons v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Baratta v. Home Depot USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roach v. AVR Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Shang Sook Min v. ABM, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Werny v. Roberts Plywood Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Lawson v. OneSource Facility Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008