Frankfater v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander Del Giorno, J.
The State has moved for an order dismissing the above-entitled claim on the following grounds: (1) that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, (2) the *160claim fails to state a cause of action, (3) the claim fails to state facts sufficient to allow a recovery, and (4) the facts of the claim were the subject of a prior litigation which was decided adversely to claimants and are, therefore, res judicata.
In 1955 the State undertook the reconstruction of Route 17-B in Sullivan County pursuant to State highway projects designated as State Highway 890 Monticello-Mongaup Valley and State…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Ausable Chasm Co. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Campbell v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
- New York State Thruway Authority v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1966
- Frankfater v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962