Legal Opinion

Ausable Chasm Co. v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1935No. Claim 23497; Claim 23502PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The claimants have recovered judgments in the Court of Claims for the amounts which they expended for the construction of a bridge over the Ausable river. The Legislature by special statute authorized the hearing of the claim. The question presented upon this appeal is whether the statute is a valid exercise of legislative power.

It appears that the Legislature in 1911 appropriated moneys for the construction and improvement of parts of Route 22, a State highway (Laws of 1911, chap. 133). In the years 1912 and 1913 the State Highway Commission, pursuant to statutory provision, entered into…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oswego Syracuse R.R. Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. v. . Canal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Aaron v. City of TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Matter of Mullane v. McKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Ruotolo v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Campbell v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
  5. City of Rochester v. ChiarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API